New Delhi: There was a hearing in the Supreme Court on Friday, in which a petition caught everyone’s attention. The petitioners claimed that the Government of India left to die in the Andaman Sea on the pretext of sending 43 Rohingya refugees to Myanmar. Women and children were also involved in these. It was put before the court that they were “deliberately pushed towards death”. But the Supreme Court not only did not agree with this claim but also gave strong reaction to it. The court reprimanded the petitioners and said that they are playing with the judicial system of the country regarding the concocted stories of social media. Read- The light of Rushdie’s eye, now he got the darkness of the prison, the 25-year-old was found- the country is going through a serious phase, the bench of Justice, Suryakant and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh, is going through a bench of petitioner Mohammad Ismail and others during the hearing- the lawyer callin Ganjalvis was going on- many challenges from the country and other challenges during the hearing. Every time they bring a new story. After all, what is its basis? The court described these allegations as completely “without proof and incredible”. Phone calls, social media posts… The court raised the evidence on the evidence, the recording of some phone calls social media posts and an international report was presented as evidence. But the court said – Who will confirm the calls you are referring to? In the past, fake calls have been made abroad from Jamtara in Jharkhand. The UN’s report also did not have an impact, trying to cite the report of the UN Human Rights Office. In this, investigation was demanded from India. On this, the court strictly said – “We do not run our policies on the advice of foreign organizations. Our agencies are capable and it is not right to hurt their dignity.” Rohingya is foreigner, action will be taken according to the law: The Courtcourt said that if Rohingya refugees are considered ‘foreigners’ under Indian laws, then they do not have the right to live in India. The court also described the identity cards of UNHCR as invalid in front of Indian law. However, the court asked Gonzalvis to send a copy of the petition to the Attorney General and Solicitor General, so that the government can consider it if he wants. Now the next hearing of this case will be held in a bench of three judges on 31 July.
Throw the Rohingyas into the sea? SC’s tough answer on claim- False stories …
Date: