No fundamental rights, why panic from investigation? Tushar Mehta’s argument in front of CJI

Last Updated: May 21, 2025, 19:59 Istwaqf Law Supreme Court Hearing: After the Waqf Law Amendment, petitions were heard in the Supreme Court. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that the objective of the government is to ensure the land of the trust for all citizens. Seas … Read more today Tushar Mehta made his arguments. (News18) The highlighted amendment was held in the Supreme Court today. The land of the government trust wants to ensure the land for all citizens. The government was put in the Supreme Court on behalf of Tushar Mehta. As soon as the South came into force in the Waqf law Parliament, the petitions in the Supreme Court got a halt. Today the bench of CJI BR Gawai heard this. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared on behalf of the central government, presented the side on Wednesday. He presented many strong arguments in the court in protest against the petitions. He said that the government wants to ensure the land of the trust for all citizens. Tushar Mehta said, before the amendment of the Waqf Act 2013, it was said in all versions of the Act that only Muslims can work their property. But an amendment was made just before the 2013 general election, according to which anyone can work on their own property. Waqf means… Solicitor General said, “Waqf means that the property is of someone else according to the use. You have earned rights by continuously using. So it is important that private/government property is used for a long time. If there is a building which is a government property, can the government not investigate whether the property is of the government or not? The provision of the Trust is in 3 (C). Alal Aulad has been added. Daughters and widowed women have not been included in the beginning. Can not. It is not the last. Nothing more than this, I am active in Sandeep Gupta Journalism for more than 14 years. Worked as a reporter.

Source link