The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition demanding an FIR against Justice Yashwant Verma. The court said that the Chief Justice has sent the report of the inquiry committee to the President and the PM. If the petitioner wants, he can submit a memorandum for action."Auto" Style ="Text-Align: justify;"> & nbsp;
In the petition of advocate Mathews Nedmaras, it was said that getting a large amount of money at the judge’s house is a serious matter. Now the investigation committee of three judges has also found the allegations correct. In such a situation, a criminal case should be filed against Justice Verma. The absence of this is against the right to equality of Article 14 of the Constitution. The judge cannot be given special status.
& nbsp;
More like this
A bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjwal Bhuiyan told the petitioner that an in house committee was formed to investigate the case. After his report, the Chief Justice has sent it to the President and the Prime Minister. You first give them a memorandum for action. You do not know what is written in the report. We do not even know. If the government does not take satisfactory action, then you can file a petition again.
& nbsp;
The petitioner also opposed the decision on the judges to make the consent of the Chief Justice of India compulsory for the FIR. In the decision of the Constitution Bench in the Veeraswamy case in 1991, it was arranged that the FIR against the High Court or Supreme Court judge could be done only with the consent of the Chief Justice, but the judges have just called the idea unnecessary."Auto" Style ="Text-Align: justify;"> & nbsp;
The lawyer repeatedly talked about maintaining the trust of the common man. On this, the judge said, ‘We understood that you want to raise the voice of the common man, but the current system is made up of many decisions of the Supreme Court. Common people can also understand the intention behind him."Auto" Style ="Text-Align: justify;"> & nbsp;
At the end of the hearing, the petitioner discussed that the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill was not passed in Parliament in 2010 for investigation against the judges. He said that such a law should be made. On this, the judges said that he cannot give any instructions to Parliament."Auto" Style ="Text-Align: justify;"> & nbsp;
More like thisRelated
From Muslim to Christian country, India tightened tightens on Pakistan from all sides
Last Updated: May 25, 2025, 10:07 Istopiation Sindoor: India...